Tapatalk

David Jump's "Stranglehold" on Downtown

David Jump's "Stranglehold" on Downtown

41
New MemberNew Member
41

May 10, 2005#1

For anyone who missed this article in last week's Riverfront Times, it is a must read..







Stranglehold

Downtown real estate speculator David Jump goes for the jugular when he smells blood. Who the hell is this guy?

BY RANDALL ROBERTS











Because of Jump, says

developer Kevin McGowan (above),

Washington Avenue is on the comeback trail.










Who is David Jump? Few people are willing to answer that question, and none of them are David Jump.



"He's a prince," says one acquaintance.



"He's a strange bird," says another.



Mississippi River men know Jump as a barge- and towboat-owner, Illinois farmers know him as the proprietor of a grain-milling concern, and railroad men know of his boxcar business. Commodities traders know Jump's the majority owner of the Merchants Exchange of St. Louis, dealing in barge futures.



Gamblers unlucky enough to be in the Admiral Casino (now the President) on April 4, 1998, know David Jump as owner of the Anne Holly, the towboat that rammed the Eads Bridge and lost its load, causing a barge to strike the floating riverboat. Nudged from its mooring, the Admiral nearly went on a Mississippi ghost ride.



And downtown developers know him for his many buildings along Washington Avenue. In that small, insular community, people have strong feelings about the man. To those Jump has helped, he's a misunderstood savior. But to those he's ignored or profited from, he is Dave Jump, the speculator -- a word they spit out as if someone possessed with The Golden Hunch must be evil.



Utter his name at downtown cocktail parties, and everyone offers an opinion: Jump's a civic roadblock, deliberately holding up progress. He sits on his properties and waits to make a killing. And yet, he's shined a light on a district that others were ignoring.



What many probably don't know, though, is that Jump saved the City Museum. Without him, Bob Cassilly's museum would have gone under four years ago. Today, as the main investor in a project with no long-range plan, Jump holds the purse strings for Cassilly's whims. He is the co-owner of both the building and the museum.



Now, six years after buying his first downtown property, David Jump is selling. In the past two years, he's unloaded four of his downtown properties. Another is under contract, and the most prominent, the Lesser-Goldman Building at 1201-1219 Washington, is rumored to be close to a sale.



Could this be the end of David Jump's stranglehold on Washington Avenue?



Jump won't answer, but what else is new? Stumble across his name in print, you'll inevitably see a variation on this theme: "David Jump did not return phone calls." Read it again here: Even after much badgering, Jump refused to be interviewed for this article.



"He's incredibly elusive," confirms one downtown developer who asked not to be named in this story. "He doesn't like publicity and keeps an incredibly low profile. When you're standing there, and you're looking at somebody in blue jeans that are too short and a T-shirt that maybe could have been a size larger, and you're told that he could write a check for $100 million, you're like, 'OK.'



"He just doesn't fit the bill. He's not opulent, and he's not flashy. He's under the radar, which makes him very smart. When you're high-profile, you're easy to shoot at."







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Between the Eads Bridge to the east and 20th Street to the west, Washington Avenue is a glory to behold. Created to house a once-thriving fashion district, the street has a rococo flair. Buildings are concrete, brick and pine; century-old warehouses resemble a row of antique filing cabinets.



"You don't see these ornamentally striking fa?ades in other warehouse districts," says Jump's business partner, Sam Glasser, pointing out the window of his New City Realty office on Washington. "These buildings are gems."



Throughout the latter part of the twentieth century, the buildings were nearly empty. While other urban areas across the nation reinvented themselves as loft districts, downtown St. Louis languished.



"In 1999, I took Dave on a walk down Washington Avenue," recalls developer Kevin McGowan. "And within a matter of six months, we had bought four of the larger properties on the street."



[Read the rest]:



http://www.riverfronttimes.com/issues/c ... ature.html

6,602
AdministratorAdministrator
6,602

May 10, 2005#2

From what I have read so far (I'm reading it while on break at work, 3/4 through), he is an interesting man. I think McGowan makes him out a little better than he is though.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

May 10, 2005#3

People should be judged by their character and not by their race, ethnicity, or place(s) where they were raised. That said, Mr. Glasser from New York, and business partner to Jump is of sour character by his responses and beliefs as put forth in the article by himself. One would prefer that a more God-fearing person like Richard Baron would have been better suited to buy the Downtown buildings a decade or two ago and wait until the right time to send them to market. Jump was not the Only person that wanted to buy those buildings a decade or two ago, he's just the one that made the deal and bought them. Other people could have done a better job to be the transition owners of the buildings. My only positive comment for Jump is: At least he did not destroy or level the buildings for parking lots.

6,602
AdministratorAdministrator
6,602

May 11, 2005#4

I do commend him for that. Almost surprising he hasn't.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

May 11, 2005#5

I think the fact that Jump did not have the buildings condemed or leveled for parking does indicate that Jump saw the same potental for development that others such as McGowan did, and in that light Jump should be lauded for seeing what the area could become. It is clear from the article Jump wanted the buildings for there development potental and not parking lots and the revenue they could generate. However, the fact that Jump did not sell the buildings also shows his vision of holding onto the property only to flip them when development peaked and that he clearly slowed the development along Washington Ave. Lots of companies over the years buy buildings and hold them untill they can be developed. how long has pyramid owned the Arcade and Paul Brown Buildings before development could begin?

Jump should also be given a cuddos for saving the City Museum, which is a huge part of the district.

399
Full MemberFull Member
399

May 11, 2005#6

I think a lot of the problem people have with Mr. Jump is that he is viewed as a speculator. Sure Pyramid has had the Arcade and the Paul Brown for while, but we know they are planning to redevelop them when the financing rolls around. Jump has owned the Building at Tucker and Washington for how long? And we all know that he is not going to redevelop it himself. He's waiting for the right buyer to come along, and a large profit off his initial investment in the building. This upsets a lot of people because he's one, holding up development, and two jacking up the price for the eventual development in the area by asking such high prices for the buildings. That being said, he's smart, he's going to make his money; the boom downtown is not slowing and someone is going to meet his price eventually. And for as much as he may have slowed progress, he did not stop it. None of his buildings are condemned or in danger of falling down. He's done repairs, and basically gotten them ready to sell. And he does need to be commended for stepping in and saving the City Museum. The city Museum is one of those rare institutions that a city can really hang its hat on, and it would have been sad if we would have lost it. Like most things in life it's not all black or white. It's mostly grey and ambiguous. One last note, I wish he would have bought the Century Building.

9,997
AdministratorAdministrator
9,997

May 11, 2005#7

Why would he kick out Amitin's Bookstore - wasn't his cash flow reduced when he lost a paying tenant?

399
Full MemberFull Member
399

May 11, 2005#8

I was wondering why he gave A Amitin books the boot as well. The article did not explain it at all.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

May 11, 2005#9

Yes, removing A Amitin books would reduce his cash flow, but it might also have made the building more atractive for future development. In the article it talks about how much space A Amitin took up in the building and how long it took to get the space cleaned out. If Amitin is gone, a future developer does not have to:

a. work around Amitin presence during redevelopment, which can increase the cost of a project and make the building less desirable

b. make sure that the prime retail space on the corner of Tucker and Washington was cleaned out so a developer could develope and lease the space.

In either case, it could make the building more atractive the buyers and could therefore bring Jump a higher selling price.

1,448
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,448

May 11, 2005#10

JMedwick: Your points about evicting Amintin make sense but why evict Amintin but not Gus?

41
New MemberNew Member
41

May 12, 2005#11

What I struggle with the most in this article is deciding whether I think Jump is a facilitator at all, or simply a parasite out to pounce on a buck when the time is right..



Sure, as it is mentioned, he saved the City Museum, but I think he was doing that more for a friend than viewing at it as any cog in the downtown landscape. If he had no connection with Casily, it likely might be sitting there for years rotting away under his control.



If he wanted, or had any pride in the area, he could really play a strong catalist role in the progress of downtown. As the article mentions, he has ownership of a building that resides in a high-traffic area, in plain view of visitors and presents a gloomy picture of the area. The guy's a multi-millionaire for crimony's sake. Why not do something for the turf you made all your green off of?

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

May 12, 2005#12

Gus's is moving...there was an article aways back about him moving to olive?...but he's definitely in the process...
Who needs a signature when you have theme music...

1,355
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,355

May 12, 2005#13

The name Sam Glasser rings a bell. Who is it that owns or owned the large building directly across Grand from Powell Hall? He was a very elderly man from out east and would not allow development for many years. He may still own it.



Also, don't forget Larry Deutch. He trumps David Jump as an owner on Washington Ave. Larry and his wife held the development rights along the district for many years. The primary problem was that the market wasn't there for most of those years.

6,602
AdministratorAdministrator
6,602

May 12, 2005#14

^Ya, the two of them together have not been the biggest help to downtown. At least the properties are now being sold, even though the prices were inflated.

9,997
AdministratorAdministrator
9,997

May 12, 2005#15

Didn't Glasser own the building that used to house the Ruth's Chris Steak House - the one that almost got torn down to make room for the city jail? Or was that guy's name Glazer/Glaser?



I seem to remember hearing about Gus buying a building on Locust (near the failed David Slay restaurant).



I'm glad that Deutch is out of the picture.

1,355
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,355

May 12, 2005#16

It was the Mr. Coffee guy. I think it was spelled Glazer.

6,602
AdministratorAdministrator
6,602

May 12, 2005#17

I think Gus had even opened his new store, but the old one is still there. So maybe it is a slow transition. I will have to look for the other store when I am down there tommorrow.

1,649
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,649

Feb 06, 2006#18

EXCLUSIVE REPORTS

From the February 3, 2006 print edition



<A HREF="http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... ml">Jump's gamble pays off</A>

Lisa R. Brown



When David Jump took a walk westward down Washington Avenue with Kevin McGowan in 1999, boarded-up and vacant buildings stretched from Laclede's Landing for blocks upon blocks.



Jump made a leap of faith from that walk, spending several million dollars to purchase at least a dozen long-neglected buildings from 1999 to 2005.



<A HREF="http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/ ... tory2.html">>>> read more</A>